That Benedikt XVI. did not know, what it its cardinal Secretary of State in the case sank Pölten to the signature submitted, is not only improbably, because the doctor father of a maintaken part was in the scandal a papal private secretary.

(, pc. Pölten kreuz.net) recent appeared a book, which concerns itself with the Homo scandals, which in July 2004 line and staff of the seminar for priests of the Diözese sank Pölten shook.

The work is published from Reinhard Dörner and stands under the title „for the truth the honour! The scandal of pc. Pölten “. Appeared it with `Books on Demand' in north first EDT.

The journalist Patrick Bahners was occupied on 18 August in `the Frankfurt general Zeitung' with the new publication.

It points out that on the web page of Mons. Kurt Krenn, which of sank Pöltner moral theologian Joseph Spindelböck one operates, appeared a critical discussion of the book: „That will only encourage the authors in their theory of a conspiracy “.

The authors suggest that her hero, bishop Kurt Krenn, which does not go any longer publicly into action, in which force of its enemies is. Its secretary shields it.

In truth the bishop is ill and no longer accessible.

A contribution of the Romanistin Gabriele Waste forms the main part of the book: „With medium-theoretical vocabulary it wants to expose the scandal as fiction “- so Bahners:

„The fiction thesis would come up nevertheless only if at the conditions nothing Anstößiges had been. “

„The criticism of the book at the judgements of the Viennese of land and higher regional court, which certified the Austrian week magazine `Profil' the truth proof in the core to have led suppresses the detailed appreciation of the reliability of the different witnesses. “

Bahners refers also to in July 2004 the circulating scandal photos of rain and Subregens at that time sank Pöltner of seminar for priests and quotes in addition the present Diözesanbischof Klaus Küng:

These photographs were in the church criminal procedures not the decisive evidence and showed „anyhow a proximity and attitudes, which are not suitable for office-holders “.

Bahners explains also that all church procedures in the case were terminated on 5 March of this yearly by a decree of the Kleruskongregation: „All orders Küngs were not accepted” finally confirmed “, the redresses inserted against it” “. “

The authors split in the evaluation of this decision: Mrs. Waste calls one „a thoroughly balanced decision of the holy chair “. Publisher Dörner sees therein „the summit at scandal “.

It requests the Pope, that from it on 28 January approbierte decree to cancel and „personally “the thing take care of.

Bahners comment: „That the Pope did not know, what submitted cardinal Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone to him to the signature, is not only improbably, because the doctor father recently with a book for the burning question `of the Pastoral without minister? 'emerging Kirchenrechtlers Rothe Benedikts secretary George Gänswein was. “

Gentleman count: catholikus

One can have reverence only from so humans, who also earn same. Unfortunately Küng has itself abqualifiziert in each form.
All that Mithüpfer are to be become bare saliva speichellecker over something. I received very much from discussion witnesses, how Küng said constantly the untruth. Well and too all-lastly: Where does Küngs remain reverence before? Where does the brotherly love remain with KLüng? Küng is a bad example of the youth. [zensuriert]

Catholicus: Dear Hugo

… with such disqualifizierenden estimates, which more over you state than over that person (bishop Küng), who you attack, stand it - I think - probably „outside of the church condition sheet “the bishop of owed minimum of reverence and obedience

Hugo: From the editorship removes

Berengeria: @ Pauli

Your shouting is in vain - and who makes as much shouting as you, which must either its bad conscience betäuben or it lies: The truth will survive the pc. Pöltner dictator and you!

HeinrichvonOfterdingen: Dear JoPa1,

that is nevertheless all Rhetorik!

Johannes Paul I.: Oh?

If it like that is, like you, Dr. Berengeria write, have the FAZ Rezensent (see above!) the Mach work „the truth… “correctly described. The time of the Mach work did not even begin. To the memory:

1. In Reinhard the Dörners lie book „the truth… “writing Dr. Gabriele Waste lied.

2. The lie book Dörners and Wastes applying magazine „13. “lied likewise.

3. And now still to further here statements Dr. Berengerias after-readable in the anonymous forum:

+ 21 July 2007, 18:16: „The retention and/or re-establishment of the Karfreitagsfürbitte for the Jews would be an important step of the break with the mistakes of the IITH Vatikanums, in the sense of the Missionierungsauftrages of the church. “Well, which we have here for a revisionistic Sedisvakantistin? As already said: a revisionism pairs itself gladly with the next. Who dovetails such nonsense in these large sheets, can also never be competent, in verwobenen to put in a word but now validly solved case pc. Pölten.

+ 23 July 2007, 11:47: „Without Ökumene the Protestants - and not only it - would arrive probably rather at the insight that the catholic church really protected those only is. From there: One does to dialogue without Ökumene and „“, in order to arrive at the unit. “Oh, and in which century you live? Already once of the fact it belongs that dialogue and mission do not exclude themselves?

+ 21 August 2008, 16:50: „All witnesses for the defense became of the pc. Pöltner Psychodikta…